Manchester United’s Anthony Martial has been a subject of intense scrutiny in recent times, with fans, pundits, and even his own manager. Erik ten Hag, expressing their views on his performance. However, one voice that strongly disagrees with Ten Hag’s assessment is former Manchester United captain and football pundit, Roy Keane. In this article, we will delve into the, but conflicting opinions surrounding Martial’s form and why Keane staunchly supports the French striker.
Erik ten Hag, who took over the managerial reins at Manchester United at the start of the season, but has not been shy about voicing his concerns regarding Anthony Martial’s performance on the pitch. The Dutch manager has consistently pointed out Martial’s lackluster displays, but raising questions about his commitment and contribution to the team. Ten Hag’s candid remarks about Martial have sparked a debate among fans and pundits alike.
Read More: Romano says ‘enormous’ Gravenberch undergoing medical at Liverpool
What did Roy Keane said about it
Ten Hag’s primary concern appears to revolve around Martial’s work rate and defensive contribution. He has emphasized the importance of a collective. Team effort and expects his forwards to press high and defend from the front. In Ten Hag’s system, but every player must contribute defensively, and he believes Martial has not met those expectations.
Roy Keane, known for his no-nonsense approach to football, but vehemently disagrees with Ten Hag’s assessment of Anthony Martial. In Keane’s view, the criticism directed at Martial is unfair and misplaced. He argues that Martial possesses qualities that make him a valuable asset to Manchester United.
One of Keane’s key points is Martial’s ability to score goals. While Martial may not be the most industrious player when it comes to defensive duties. Keane contends that his primary responsibility is to put the ball in the back of the net. Throughout his career, Martial has demonstrated a knack for finding the goal, and Keane believes that shouldn’t be overlooked.
